Evaluating Trade Offs Between Quality and Cost

Evaluating Trade Offs Between Quality and Cost

Discuss the role of decorative hardware in enhancing the visual appeal of garage doors.

When evaluating the components and materials of garage doors, one must navigate the intricate balance between quality and cost. This decision-making process requires a keen understanding of what each component contributes to the overall functionality and longevity of the door, as well as how different materials can affect performance and price.


Smart garage door systems allow you to control access from your phone repair garage door wood.

The primary components of a garage door include panels, springs, tracks, rollers, and openers. Each plays a crucial role in ensuring smooth operation. Panels are often the most visible part of the door; they come in various materials such as steel, wood, aluminum, or fiberglass. Steel is known for its durability and low maintenance but can be prone to rust if not properly coated. Wood offers aesthetic appeal but demands regular upkeep to prevent warping or rot. Aluminum is lightweight and resistant to corrosion but may dent easily. Fiberglass provides a good compromise with its resistance to both rot and corrosion; however, it lacks insulation properties compared to other materials.


Springs are another critical component that bears the weight of the door during opening and closing cycles. Torsion springs tend to offer higher durability compared to extension springs but come at a higher initial cost. Tracks and rollers facilitate smooth movement; opting for high-quality bearings in rollers can reduce noise significantly and extend lifespan.


The choice of opener technology also impacts both cost and convenience. Chain-drive openers are usually less expensive yet noisier than belt-drive systems which provide quiet operation at a premium price point.


In weighing these options against budget constraints, several trade-offs emerge. Investing in high-quality materials might entail higher upfront costs but generally results in lower long-term maintenance expenses and enhanced reliability-key factors for those valuing durability over initial savings. Conversely, opting for more economical choices might be suitable for short-term needs or when budget limitations take precedence over longevity considerations.


Ultimately, selecting garage door components involves foresight into future needs alongside current financial capacity. Buyers must consider their specific requirements: Is thermal insulation crucial due to regional climate conditions? Is noise reduction necessary because of living space proximity? By understanding these personal priorities alongside material characteristics, individuals can make informed decisions that appropriately balance quality with cost-a nuanced evaluation that ensures satisfaction over time without compromising essential features or budgetary boundaries.


Navigating this landscape requires careful thought but ultimately leads to a tailored solution that aligns with one's unique preferences while maximizing value-a testament to the thoughtful consideration inherent in any home improvement endeavor involving garage doors.

In the dynamic world of business, particularly in manufacturing and product development, organizations frequently face the critical challenge of balancing quality and cost. This delicate equilibrium can significantly influence a company's long-term performance and durability. Understanding how quality impacts these factors is essential for making informed decisions that ensure sustainable success.


Quality, as a concept, extends beyond mere compliance with standards or specifications. It encompasses customer satisfaction, product longevity, brand reputation, and competitive advantage. High-quality products often command higher prices and foster customer loyalty. These attributes are invaluable in an increasingly competitive marketplace where consumer expectations are continually evolving.


Investing in quality can initially seem like an expensive endeavor. Superior materials, skilled labor, enhanced processes, and rigorous testing all come at a cost. However, the benefits of such investments are multifaceted and enduring. High-quality products tend to have fewer defects and require less frequent repairs or replacements. This results in lower warranty claims and enhances brand reputation over time. A strong reputation for quality can differentiate a company from its competitors, potentially leading to increased market share and pricing power.


Conversely, compromising on quality to save costs might offer immediate financial relief but could prove detrimental in the long run. Inferior products may lead to customer dissatisfaction and negative reviews that damage brand integrity. The costs associated with handling returns, repairs, or legal issues related to poor-quality products can outweigh initial savings.


Moreover, consumers today are more enlightened than ever before; they value transparency and ethical practices alongside product excellence. Companies that prioritize quality often demonstrate their commitment to ethical standards by ensuring fair labor practices and environmentally sustainable production processes-factors that resonate well with modern consumers.


The trade-off between quality and cost requires strategic foresight where companies must weigh short-term financial gains against long-term sustainability objectives. A comprehensive understanding of this balance is crucial for leaders who aim to build resilient businesses capable of thriving amidst economic fluctuations.


Successful businesses often adopt a holistic approach by integrating quality management systems into their core strategies. By doing so, they not only enhance their operational efficiency but also align their organizational goals with customer expectations-a synergy that fosters trust and loyalty.


In conclusion, assessing the impact of quality on long-term performance involves evaluating how investments in superior craftsmanship translate into durable products that uphold a company's reputation over time. While navigating the trade-offs between quality and cost presents challenges, prioritizing excellence ultimately proves beneficial-ensuring both economic viability today and sustained success tomorrow.

Our Podcast:

Social Media About us:

How to reach us:


How decorative hardware enhances garage door appearances during repairs

When it comes to maintaining and enhancing the visual appeal of a home, garage doors often play a crucial role.. They are not just functional elements but also significant contributors to a home's overall aesthetic.

How decorative hardware enhances garage door appearances during repairs

Posted by on 2025-01-01

Balancing budget and style with garage door customizations

Balancing budget and style is an essential consideration for homeowners looking to enhance their property's curb appeal, particularly when it comes to garage door customizations.. The garage door is often one of the most prominent features of a home's exterior, and updating its look can significantly elevate the overall aesthetic.

Balancing budget and style with garage door customizations

Posted by on 2025-01-01

Explore different styles and materials, such as handles, hinges, and clavos.

In today's economy, consumers are often faced with a challenging decision: should they opt for budget-friendly options that offer immediate savings, or invest more in premium choices that promise superior quality and longevity? This dilemma is prevalent across various sectors, from technology and fashion to food and home goods. The evaluation of trade-offs between quality and cost requires a nuanced understanding of both personal priorities and the inherent value offered by each option.


At first glance, budget-friendly options appear attractive due to their affordability. These products allow consumers to stretch their financial resources further and potentially purchase more items than if they were to focus solely on premium goods. For instance, in the realm of electronics, opting for a budget smartphone can provide basic functionality at a fraction of the cost of high-end models. However, these savings might come with hidden costs such as limited features or durability issues that could lead to more frequent replacements over time.


Conversely, premium choices often justify their higher price tags through enhanced quality, innovative features, and longer lifespan. A well-crafted piece of furniture may not only add aesthetic value to one's home but also withstand years of use without losing its appeal or functionality. In this sense, investing in premium products can be seen as a long-term strategy; the initial expenditure is offset by reduced maintenance costs and an extended period before replacement becomes necessary.


However, making decisions based purely on price or perceived quality can overlook other important factors such as ethical considerations and environmental impact. Some budget-friendly options may involve compromises in labor practices or materials that are not sustainable. On the other hand, certain premium brands emphasize eco-friendliness and fair-trade practices as part of their core values, offering consumers an opportunity to align their purchases with personal convictions.


Ultimately, evaluating trade-offs between quality and cost involves recognizing individual needs and preferences while considering broader implications. Consumers must weigh the immediate benefits of saving money against the potential advantages of investing in quality-balancing short-term affordability with long-term value.


In conclusion, when examining cost factors through the lens of budget-friendly versus premium choices, there is no one-size-fits-all answer. Each consumer must navigate this landscape based on their unique circumstances-factoring in financial constraints, lifestyle demands, ethical beliefs-and strive towards decisions that reflect both practicality and principle. By doing so thoughtfully, individuals can make informed purchases that maximize satisfaction while minimizing regret.

Explore different styles and materials, such as handles, hinges, and clavos.

Choosing the Right Style for Your Home

When embarking on any project, whether it's constructing a new building, purchasing equipment, or launching a product line, one of the most critical considerations is evaluating trade-offs between quality and cost. The decision-making process often boils down to balancing initial costs with future maintenance expenses. Understanding this balance is crucial for ensuring long-term value and sustainability.


At the heart of this analysis lies the concept of initial costs, which encompass all expenses incurred at the project's inception. These costs can include materials, labor, and technology investments. A common temptation is to minimize these upfront expenditures to keep immediate budgets in check. However, opting for cheaper alternatives often leads to compromising on quality-a choice that might incur higher costs down the line.


On the other side of the equation are future maintenance expenses. These refer to the ongoing costs required to maintain and repair an asset over its lifespan. High-quality inputs may have a higher initial price tag but typically result in lower maintenance needs and longer durability. For instance, investing in premium construction materials might seem expensive initially but could save significant amounts in repairs and replacements in the years to come.


Balancing these elements requires a strategic approach rooted in lifecycle costing-a method that considers all costs associated with an asset over its entire life span. This approach enables decision-makers to see beyond short-term savings and consider long-term financial impact. By analyzing potential scenarios, businesses can predict how lower initial investments might lead to increased maintenance demands or how choosing superior quality from the outset could pave the way for reduced operational disruptions and enhanced efficiency.


Moreover, understanding industry standards and conducting thorough market research play pivotal roles in making informed decisions about trade-offs between quality and cost. Often, industry benchmarks provide insight into what constitutes acceptable standards without inflating budgets unnecessarily. Engaging with suppliers who prioritize sustainability can also help strike an optimal balance by offering high-quality products that reduce environmental impact while maintaining cost-effectiveness.


Ultimately, evaluating trade-offs between quality and cost is not solely about choosing either high-cost or low-cost options; it's about finding an equilibrium that aligns with organizational goals and priorities. Decision-makers must weigh factors such as anticipated usage patterns, environmental conditions, technological advancements, and even brand reputation when considering their options.


In conclusion, analyzing trade-offs between initial costs and future maintenance expenses demands a comprehensive view that transcends immediate budgetary constraints. By focusing on long-term benefits rather than short-lived savings-and leveraging strategies like lifecycle costing-organizations can make astute choices that ensure both financial prudence and sustained excellence in their endeavors. This balanced approach not only safeguards resources but also enhances resilience against unforeseen challenges over time.

Consider architectural styles and how they influence hardware selection.

In today's complex marketplace, consumers are constantly faced with the challenge of balancing quality and cost when making purchasing decisions. This trade-off is particularly evident in customer reviews and ratings, which provide valuable insights into real-world experiences with products and services. These reviews often serve as a critical resource for potential buyers who are weighing their options, offering a glimpse into the practical implications of choosing between higher-quality items and more budget-friendly alternatives.


Customer reviews frequently highlight the nuances of this quality-cost trade-off. For instance, a product might receive high praise for its superior craftsmanship or durability, yet some customers may express reservations about its price point. Conversely, a lower-cost alternative might garner attention for being budget-friendly but receive mixed feedback regarding its longevity or performance. These contrasting opinions underscore the importance of evaluating what aspects are most crucial to individual shoppers-be it long-term investment value or immediate affordability.


Moreover, customer ratings provide an aggregated perspective on how well products meet consumer expectations relative to their price. A product that achieves consistently high ratings across various criteria such as performance, reliability, and customer satisfaction likely offers a strong balance between quality and cost. On the other hand, discrepancies in ratings can signal potential red flags about either overpricing for mediocre quality or underperformance despite an attractive price tag.


The insights gleaned from customer reviews also reveal how personal preferences and situational factors influence perceptions of value. For example, a frequent traveler might prioritize lightweight luggage despite a premium cost due to the convenience it offers during travel. Meanwhile, a college student on a tight budget might opt for more affordable options even if they require replacing sooner than pricier counterparts.


Ultimately, navigating the complex interplay between quality and cost is not solely about finding the cheapest option or splurging on top-tier products; it's about identifying which attributes align best with one's needs and priorities. Customer reviews serve as an invaluable guide in this process by illustrating diverse user experiences and shedding light on whether certain compromises are worth making.


In conclusion, while there is no one-size-fits-all answer to achieving the perfect balance between quality and cost, customer reviews and ratings offer essential insights into real-world experiences that can inform smarter purchasing decisions. By examining these perspectives closely, consumers can better understand what others have encountered when grappling with similar choices-and perhaps find clarity in their own journey toward optimal value acquisition.

Material Considerations for Durability and Aesthetics

In today's fast-paced world, making informed decisions is crucial, especially when evaluating the trade-offs between quality and cost. Whether you're purchasing a new gadget, selecting a service provider, or choosing materials for a project, striking the right balance can significantly impact your satisfaction and financial well-being. While it might be tempting to opt for the cheapest option available or splurge on the highest quality, neither extreme necessarily guarantees the best outcome. Here are some tips to help you navigate this decision-making process effectively.


Firstly, it's essential to clearly define your needs and priorities. Understanding what you genuinely require allows you to focus on options that meet those criteria without being swayed by unnecessary features or add-ons. For instance, if you're buying a smartphone primarily for communication and basic apps, there may not be a need to invest in an ultra-high-end model with advanced capabilities that you'll rarely use.


Once you've outlined your needs, conduct thorough research on available options within your budget range. Compare products or services based on reviews from credible sources and user feedback. This helps ensure that you're aware of what each option offers in terms of quality and reliability. It's also beneficial to consider brands with a reputation for delivering consistent value over time rather than solely focusing on price points.


Another vital aspect of making informed decisions is recognizing potential hidden costs associated with lower-priced items or services. Sometimes opting for cheaper alternatives can lead to more frequent repairs or replacements down the line, ultimately costing more than investing in higher-quality options upfront. Conversely, expensive doesn't always mean better; there are high-cost items that do not justify their price tags when compared with slightly lower-priced counterparts offering similar performance levels.


Moreover, consider adopting a long-term perspective when evaluating trade-offs between quality and cost. Ask yourself how long you intend to use the product or service and whether paying more initially could result in savings over time due to enhanced durability or efficiency.


Additionally, don't underestimate the power of negotiation and seeking discounts wherever possible. Many vendors are open to discussing pricing structures or offering deals if approached respectfully.


Finally, personal experiences and trusted recommendations can provide valuable insights into how various factors play out in real-world scenarios beyond marketing claims.


Ultimately making informed decisions about balancing quality against cost involves considering multiple factors simultaneously while keeping an eye on both immediate affordability as well as future implications understanding these nuances will empower you towards achieving optimal outcomes tailored specifically around individual preferences without compromising either aspect unnecessarily!

Redirect to:

  • Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
A residential garage door opener. The motor is in the box on the upper-right.

A garage door opener is a motorized device that opens and closes a garage door controlled by switches on the garage wall. Most also include a handheld radio remote control carried by the owner, which can be used to open and close the door from a short distance.

The electric opener

[edit]

The electric overhead garage door opener was invented by C.G. Johnson in 1926 in Hartford City, Indiana.[1] Electric Garage Door openers did not become popular until Era Meter Company of Chicago offered one after World War II where the overhead garage door could be opened via a key pad located on a post at the end of the driveway or a switch inside the garage.[2]

As in an elevator, the electric motor does not provide most of the power to move a heavy garage door. Instead, most of door's weight is offset by the counterbalance springs attached to the door. (Even manually operated garage doors have counterbalances; otherwise, they would be too heavy for a person to open or close them.) In a typical design, torsion springs apply torque to a shaft, and that shaft applies a force to the garage door via steel counterbalance cables. The electric opener provides only a small amount of force to control how far the door opens and closes. In most cases, the garage door opener also holds the door closed in place of a lock.

The typical electric garage door opener consists of a power unit that contains the electric motor. The power unit attaches to a track. A trolley connected to an arm that attaches to the top of the garage door slides back and forth on the track, thus opening and closing the garage door. The trolley is pulled along the track by a chain, belt, or screw that turns when the motor is operated. A quick-release mechanism is attached to the trolley to allow the garage door to be disconnected from the opener for manual operation during a power failure or in case of emergency. Limit switches on the power unit control the distance the garage door opens and closes once the motor receives a signal from the remote control or wall push button to operate the door.[3]

The entire assembly hangs above the garage door. The power unit hangs from the ceiling and is located towards the rear of the garage. The end of the track on the opposite end of the power unit attaches to a header bracket that is attached to the header wall above the garage door. The powerhead is usually supported by punched angle iron.

Recently another type of opener, known as the jackshaft opener, has become more popular.[when?] This style of opener was used frequently on commercial doors but in recent years has been adapted for residential use. This style of opener consists of a motor that attaches to the side of the torsion rod and moves the door up and down by simply spinning the rod. These openers need a few extra components to function safely for residential use. These include a cable tension monitor, to detect when a cable is broken, and a separate locking mechanism to lock the door when it is fully closed. These have the advantage that they free up ceiling space that an ordinary opener and rail would occupy. These also have the disadvantage that the door must have a torsion rod to attach the motor to.

Types

[edit]

There are six types of garage door openers:

  1. Chain drive openers. These have a chain (similar to a bicycle's) that connects the trolley to the motor.
  2. Belt drive openers use a rubber belt in place of a chain.
  3. Screw drive openers have a long screw inside the track. The trolley connects to this screw.
  4. Direct drive openers have the motor installed inside the trolley and use a gear wheel to guide the trolley along a fixed chain.
  5. Jackshaft openers mount on the wall at either end of the torsion bar.
  6. Roller openers automate roller doors, which roll upward and coil around a drum above the garage entrance, maximizing space.

These openers typically feature two tines that slide into a drum wheel within the roller door mechanism, engaging to smoothly lift or lower the door.

Remote control

[edit]

The first wireless garage door openers were invented and developed by two US inventors at the same time, one in Illinois and the other in Washington state, around 1930. They were unknown to each other.[4]

The first garage door opener remote controls were simple and consisted of a simple transmitter (the remote) and receiver which controlled the opener mechanism. The transmitter would transmit on a designated frequency; the receiver would listen for the radio signal, then open or close the garage, depending on the door position. The basic concept of this can be traced back to World War II. This type of system was used to detonate remote bombs. While novel at the time, the technology ran its course when garage door openers became popular. While the garage door remote control transmitter is low power and has limited range, its signal can be received by other, nearby, garage door openers. When two neighbors had garage door openers, then opening one garage door might open the neighbor's garage door as well.

The second stage of the wireless garage door opener system solved the opening-the-neighbor's-garage-door problem. The remote controls on these systems transmitted a digital code, and the receiver in the garage responded only to that code. The codes were typically set by eight to twelve DIP switches on the receiver and transmitter, so they allowed for 28 = 256 to 212 = 4,096 different codes. As long as neighbors used different codes, they would not open each other's garage doors. The intent of these systems was to avoid interference with nearby garage doors; the systems were not designed with security in mind. Intruders were able to defeat the security of these systems and gain entry to the garage and the house. The number of codes was small enough that even an unsophisticated intruder with a compatible remote control transmitter could just start transmitting all possible codes until he found one that opened the door. More sophisticated intruders could acquire a black box master key that automatically transmitted every possible code in a short time. An even more sophisticated method is known as a replay attack. The attacker would use a code grabber, which has a receiver that captures the remote's digital code and can retransmit that digital code at a later time. The attacker with a code grabber would wait nearby for the homeowner to use his remote, capture the code, and then replay the code to open the door when the homeowner was gone. Multicode openers became unpopular in areas where security was important, but due to their ease of programming, such openers are often used to operate such things as the gates in gated apartment complexes.

An intermediate stage of the garage door opener market eliminated the DIP switches and used remotes preprogrammed to one out of roughly 3.5 billion unique codes. The receiver would maintain a security list of remotes to which it would respond; the user could easily add the unique remote's code to the list by pressing a button on the garage door opener while activating the remote control. A large number of codes made the brute force try-all-possible-digital-codes attacks infeasible, but the systems were still vulnerable to code grabbers. For user convenience, these systems were also backward compatible with the older DIP switch remote codes, but adding an old technology remote to the security list made the garage door opener vulnerable to a brute force attack to find the DIP switch code. The larger code space approach was an improvement over the fixed DIP switch codes but was still vulnerable to the replay attack.

The third stage of garage door opener technology uses a frequency spectrum range between 300-400 MHz and rolling code (code hopping) technology to defeat code grabbers. In addition to transmitting a unique identifier for the remote control, a sequence number and an encrypted message are also sent. Although an intruder could still capture the code used to open a garage door, the sequence number immediately expires, so retransmitting the code later would not open the garage door. The encryption makes it extremely difficult for an intruder to forge a message with the next sequence number that would open the door. Some rolling code systems are more involved than others. Because there is a high probability that someone will push the remote's button while not in range and thus advance the sequence number, the receiver does not insist the sequence number increase by exactly one; it will accept a sequence number that falls within a narrow window or two successive sequence numbers in a much wider window. Rolling code technology is also used on car remote controls and with some internet protocols for secure sites.

The fourth stage of garage door opener systems is similar to third stage, but it is limited to the 315 MHz frequency. The 315 MHz frequency range avoids interference from the land mobile radio system (LMRS) used by the U.S. military.

The following standards are used by units manufactured by Chamberlain (including LiftMaster and Craftsman):

Dates System Color of programming button and LED on unit Color of LED on remote*
1984–1993 8-12 DIP switch on 300-400 MHz white, gray, or yellow button with red LED red
1993–1997 Billion Code on 390 MHz green button with green or red LED green
1997–2005 Security+ (rolling code) on 390 MHz orange or red button with amber LED amber or none
2005–present Security+ (rolling code) on 315 MHz purple button with amber LED none
2011–present Security+ 2.0 (rolling code) on 310, 315, and 390 MHz yellow button with amber LED and yellow antenna wires red or blue

* Does not apply to keyless entry keypads or universal remotes.

Recent Chamberlain garage door openers that have Security+ 2.0 features also use a special serial protocol on wired connections rather than a simple switch closure.[5]

The following standards are used by units manufactured by Overhead Door Corporation and its subsidiary The Genie Company†:

Dates System
1985–1995 9–12 DIP switch on 360, 380, or 390 MHz[6][7]
1995–2005 Intellicode/CodeDodger (rolling code) on 390 MHz
2005–present Intellicode/CodeDodger (rolling code) on 315 MHz
2011–present Intellicode 2/CodeDodger 2 (rolling code) on 315 and 390 MHz

Note: There are no standard color codes for the learn button or LED on units manufactured by Overhead Door or Genie. All accessories made for later versions of Genie Intellicode and Overhead Door CodeDodger are backward compatible with previous generations of Intellicode and CodeDodger.

Cloning garage door opener remotes

[edit]
A typical photo of both the outer case and inner circuit of a garage door opener remote control.

Many garage door opener remote controls use fixed-code encoding which use DIP switches or soldering to do the address pins coding process, and they usually use pt2262/pt2272 or compatible ICs. For these fixed-code garage door opener remotes, one can easily clone the existing remote using a self-learning remote control duplicator (copy remote) which can make a copy of the remote using face-to-face copying.

Additional features

[edit]

Additional features that have been added over the years have included:

  • Automatic courtesy lights that turn on when the door opens (or via motion sensors) and automatically turn off after a preset delay
  • A remote lockout feature, which turns off the radio receiver while one is on vacation or away for an extended time.
  • The availability of accessories has increased, including such features as wireless keypads, key chain remotes, and solenoid-operated deadbolts to lock the door itself.
  • Automatic door closing feature, which after a fixed time by the owner, closes the garage door to prevent theft.

More sophisticated features are also available, such as an integrated carbon monoxide sensor to open the door in case of the garage being flooded with exhaust fumes. Other systems allow door activation over the Internet to allow home owners to open their garage door from their office for deliveries.

Another recent innovation in the garage door opener is a fingerprint-based wireless keypad. This unit attaches to the outside of the garage door on the jamb and allows users to open and close their doors with the press of a finger, rather than creating a personal identification number (PIN). This is especially helpful for families with children who may forget a code and are latchkey kids.

Safety

[edit]
Electric eye for safety

The garage door is generally the largest moving object in a home. An improperly adjusted garage door opener can exert strong and deadly forces and might not reverse the garage door in an emergency. The manufacturer's instructions provide guidance to the user on the proper adjustment and maintenance of the opener.

Garage door openers manufactured and installed in the United States since 1982 are required to provide a quick-release mechanism on the trolley that allows for the garage door to be disconnected from the garage door opener in the event of entrapment.[8] Garage door openers manufactured since 1991 are also required to reverse the garage door if it strikes a solid object.[9][10]

In the United States, the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 1990 required that automatic residential garage door operators manufactured on or after 1 January 1991 conform to the entrapment protection requirements of the 1988 version of ANSI/UL standard 325.[11] A requirement for redundant entrapment-prevention devices was added in 1993; such a system can use an electric eye, a door edge sensor, or any other device that provides equivalent protection by reversing the travel of the closing door if an object is detected in its path.[12][13]

California Senate Bill No. 969

[edit]

In California, Senate Bill No. 969 requires that any automatic residential garage door opener that is manufactured for sale, sold, offered for sale, or installed in a residence to have a battery backup function that is designed to operate when activated because of an electrical outage.[14] The bill went into effect on July 1, 2019. Under the bill, any automatic garage door opener that is in violation is subject to a civil penalty of $1000.

The bill was passed by Gov. Jerry Brown on Sept. 21, 2018, in response to the 2017 California Wildfires in which at least 5 individuals lost their lives because they could not open their garage door when the power went out.[15]

The Door and Access Systems Manufacturers Association International opposed the bill arguing that garage door openers with backup batteries require regular maintenance and that the bill should be amended to make this clear. In addition, they said that "garage door openers with backup batteries are not designed to serve as life safety devices, and should not be relied upon to prove a means of egress from a garage during an electrical outage."[16]

The bill passed, despite most garage doors having a release pull cord.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Robert J Girod (2014). "Garage Door Openers - High-tech Burglary". Advanced Criminal Investigations and Intelligence Operations: Tradecraft Methods, Practices, Tactics, and Techniques. Taylor and Francis. p. 90. ISBN 9781482230741.
  2. ^ "Aids To Modern Living - Garage Doors". Popular Science: 137. December 1946.
  3. ^ Castro, Diane. "The Complete Garage Door System". Regency Conference Center. Retrieved 10 March 2020.
  4. ^ "Widely Separated Inventors Invent Garage Door Openers By Radio Impulses". Popular Science: 32. February 1931.
  5. ^ "Will my older accessories work with the new line of Security+ 2.0 garage door openers?". alldaygaragerepair.com. Retrieved 2017-06-23.
  6. ^ Willmes, Dave. "My Overhead Door Opener Doesn't Work with this Universal Remote". www.overheaddooronline.com. Retrieved 20 October 2016.
  7. ^ "FCC ID BSH8YN106546 by Overhead Door Corporation". FCCID.io. Retrieved 20 October 2016.
  8. ^ "Falling Garage Doors — A Crushing Concern". Garage Door Child Safety.
  9. ^ "Non Reversing Garage Door Openers a Hazard" (PDF). U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
  10. ^ "Garage Door System Safety Guidelines". Door & Access Systems Manufacturers Association International. Archived from the original on 2008-12-23.
  11. ^ Garage Door Operators • CPSC
  12. ^ Non-Reversing Automatic Garage Door Openers Are a Hazard • CPSC
  13. ^ 16CFR1211
  14. ^ "Bill Text - SB-969 Automatic garage door openers: backup batteries". leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. California Legislative Information. Retrieved 6 September 2019.
  15. ^ "New California Law Could Cost You $1000 in Fines". Clark's Garage Door. 4 September 2019. Retrieved 6 September 2019.
  16. ^ "California Mandates Battery Backup With All GDOS - Experts Cite Problems With The Legislation" (PDF). dasma.com. DASMA. Retrieved 6 September 2019.
[edit]
  • Official FCC notification on garage opener frequencies (PDF)
  • Garage Door Opener Safety Tips (Washington Post)
  • Safety Commission Rules For Automatic Garage Door Openers - U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC, 1992
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo

Driving Directions in Will County


Driving Directions From Honorable Robert P Livas to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Pep Boys to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Honorable Edward A Burmila Jr to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Joliet to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Honorable Thomas A Dunn to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Gaylord Building Historic Site to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Fox Museum to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Lincoln Landing to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Isle A La Cache Museum Pavilion to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Knoch Knolls Nature Center to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Lockport Prairie Nature Preserve to Overhead Door Company of Joliet
Driving Directions From Lake Renwick Heron Rookery Nature Preserve to Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Reviews for Overhead Door Company of Joliet


Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Hector Melero

(5)

Had a really great experience with Middleton Overhead Doors. My door started to bow and after several attempts on me fixing it I just couldn’t get it. I didn’t want to pay on something I knew I could fix. Well, I gave up and they came out and made it look easy. I know what they are doing not to mention they called me before hand to confirm my appointment and they showed up at there scheduled appointment. I highly recommend Middleton Overhead Doors on any work that needs to be done

Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Owen McCarthy

(5)

I called the office just by chance to see if there was an available opening for a service call to repair a busted spring. Unfortunately I didn’t catch the name of the person who answere, but she couldn’t have been more pleasant and polite. She was able to get a tech to my house in an hour. I believe the tech’s name was Mike and he too was amazing. He quickly resolved my issue and even corrected a couple of things that he saw that weren’t quite right. I would recommend to anyone and will definitely call on Middleton for any future needs. Thank you all for your great service.

Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Kelley Jansa

(5)

We used Middleton Door to upgrade our garage door. We had three different companies come out to quote the job and across the board Middleton was better. They were professional, had plenty of different options and priced appropriately. The door we ordered came with a small dent and they handled getting a new panel ordered and reinstalled very quickly.

Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Jim Chuporak

(5)

Received a notice the morning of telling me when to expect the men to come and put the door in. he was on time, answered all my questions, worked diligently in the cold. And did an absolutely awesome job. Everything was cleaned up, hauled away from the old door. I am extremely happy with the service I received from the first phone call I made through having the door put in. My wife and I are very, very happy with the door.

Overhead Door Company of Joliet

Andrea Nitsche

(4)

Scheduling was easy, job was done quickly. Little disappointed that they gave me a quote over email (which they confirmed was for labor and materials), but when they finished it was just over $30 more. Not a huge deal, but when I asked why, I was told they gave me an approx cost and it depends on what is needed. I get that in general, however, they installed the door and I gave them my address and pics of the existing prior to getting a quote. I feel like they could have been more upfront with pricing. And just a heads up, it was pricey... Had them change the weather stripping, from ringing my doorbell to pulling out my driveway when done was literally 20 mins, cost was just over $260 😬

View GBP